Clayton has an interesting discussion on Plantinga’s argument against the plausibility of evolutionary naturalism (how exactly you define the theory has philosophical implications that I want to avoid for now).

Plantinga’s argument reminds me of the one suggested by Bill Vallicella and cited by me here. I hope to post some thoughts on it after mulling it over for a little while. (I know I promised that already but it’s a tough issue and I’ve been applying to law school).

Stay tuned and, in the meantime, let me know what you think.