Howard Zinn: Truth is Relative But Mine’s Better
Historian Howard Zinn doesn’t like Walter Kirn’s NYTimes review of his book, A Young People’s History of the United States. He even accuses Kirn of believing in objective truth, which, he claims, even “bright 12 year-olds” realize is nonsense.
The reviewer seems to hold to the 19th-century von Ranke idea that there is one truth to be told. Most historians, and most intelligent people, including bright 12-year-olds, understand that there is no such thing as a single “objective” truth, but that there are different truths according to the viewpoint of the historian.
The absurdity of Zinn’s relativism quickly reveals itself in the next paragraph. (more…)
